If you are looking for plus size loungewear or plus size bras that don’t break the bank, then check out the latest from the ThirdLove x Dia & Co Collaboration!
Fat, Fat, Fat, Fat, Fat, Fat, Fat, Fat, Fat. There I said it.
However, I think Marilyn Wann said it best with her size positive book, Fat!So? It took me a while to sit and ponder about this after reading this weekend’s latest spew of hatred and disdain for those of the fat persuasion. Literally, tears of frustration welled up in my eyes out of anger, disbelief, and frustration.
What am I referencing? The lovely Huffington Post article, inappropriately titled, “Fat is the new ‘N’ word.” As an educated woman of color and a fashionable plus size woman (who finds great pleasure in calling myself Curvy), offenses were taken throughout the entire article.
Actually, she had me at Fat.
Cleverly disguised as a “Girlfriend’s Guide,” giving her a platform to spew her nonsense, Vicki Iovine touts her knowledge supreme when referencing the “real” issue of obesity, our fear of the “F” word, and the true definition of Fat, equating it with murderer. Yes, girl, she goes there! Keep reading!
She starts of this soapbox rant with her ever so keen insights about how unfortunate Kevin Smith’s fight with Southwest, charging this is why people are afraid of the “F” word. So ticked off with the absurdity of the Nightline conversation with “silly women” Marianne Kirby, Crystal Renn, and others, she rants:
The utter ridiculousness of this phobia was played out this week on ABC’s “Nightline,” where a panel of silly people debated whether being fat is, indeed, a bad thing.
One silly panelist was a fat young woman (there, I’ve said it!), another a former model who now wears a size 12 (the average 5’4″ American woman wears a size 16. The model was about 5’10–you do the math), a former fatty who dieted about 100 pounds off her frame and a silly skinny extremist whose mission is to chastise fat people for costing not-fat people countless dollars in health care and accommodations.
Trying to make twisted sense of it all, Ms. Iovine continues to draw conclusions and prescribe her personal analysis and treatment of being fat:
My personal interpretation of the facts is that our DNA is undermining our best efforts–not personal slovenliness or lack of backbone. We were designed to be hunter/gatherers who did not eat regularly or with any predictability.
On one hand she takes it to our DNA, next she is admonishing parents for the reason why we have fat children:
Not talking about it is cowardly and patronizing and, ultimately cruel because behind almost every fat child is a fat parent who can’t demonstrate the behavior necessary to rescue them from this life sentence.
How does she conclude the end of the article?
Let’s call fat by its proper name: Murderer.
Okay… Ms. Iovine and all others who ignorantly abhor all things Fat and Curvy:
I find it amazingly frustrating on one hand and on another, I feel sorry for you. To ignorantly paint all of America with a broad paintbrush is, well, dumb. Leave the definitions, studies, prescriptions, solutions, and judgments to yourself, I do not need your thoughts impeding upon my happiness, thank you very much.
No, we do not all sit at home on a sofa, stuffing out mouths with bon bons, disheveled, depressed, and poor. Contrary to your beliefs. Step off your soapbox, and with all the free time you have make snap judgments you know nothing about, how about you take the advice of my friend @magickalrealism
“The unresearched, presumptuous stupidity of this post. It burns. Start here: http://junkfoodscience.blogspot.com Go slowly. Undoing all these flat out wrong assumptions about fat and how it works might end up putting you in therapy. I’m fat, and fine with it.
Please do not EVER again conflate body judgment with racism. EVER. They are entirely separate ways of being narrow minded, stupid and smug.”
Oh, and maybe from @sparklemonster:
You know what you would’ve done if your article was meant to help? Written about processed foods, marketing, affordability of healthy food, and all other problems consumers face. Instead you’re trying to shame us fatties into skinniness. The way to help an emotional overeater? Not shame. The way to help someone who doesn’t know better, thanks to aggressive marketing since birth? Also NOT SHAME.
Should you be interested in actually informing, I invite you to follow me to the grocery store with my tiny budget and watch me try to buy wisely even though I can only afford junk. But of course you don’t actually want to be helpful. You want flashy and ad-revenue generating. So you’ve made an offensive word comparison and called some people “fatties.”
Congratulations, you alienated the people you claim to want to help. Try actually researching before you write your next suckfest. (And maybe do enough research to discover there are healthy fatties, and sick skinny people, and it’s not what you weigh, it’s what you EAT, and that’s where the availability of healthy food and aggressive marketing becomes the issue, as it should be.)
Since you won’t do that though, a compromise: venture into a public crowd of overweight people and try to “help” them by shaming and not educating. When you’re out from the shield of the internet I’m sure you’ll see how helpful you really are.”
Better yet, step off your soapbox, crawl into your corner, you are now on a permanent timeout.